Liability for Rideshare Brake Failure and Mechanical Defect Accidents in Utah


Rideshare services like Uber and Lyft have become extremely popular in recent years, with the market projected to be worth $564 billion by 2031. However, the rise of ridesharing has also led to concerns about safety and liability, especially regarding mechanical failures and defects. This article examines liability issues related to brake failures and other mechanical defects in rideshare vehicles that lead to accidents in Utah.

Uber and Lyft Driver Requirements in Utah

Utah has specific requirements for Uber and Lyft drivers related to vehicle safety and maintenance. Drivers must have their vehicles inspected every year. Inspections check items like brakes, tires, lights, and other components. Vehicles must be 15 years old or newer, have 5-8 seatbelts, four doors, and not be salvaged. These requirements are intended to help prevent mechanical defects and failures. However, accidents still occur.

Liability When the Rideshare Driver is at Fault

If a rideshare accident in Utah occurs due to driver error, such as the driver failing to properly maintain the vehicle, the driver is likely liable. Uber and Lyft require drivers to carry insurance. The driver’s insurance would provide coverage in the event of an at-fault accident.

However, insurance minimums may not fully compensate victims. Drivers are therefore advised to carry higher insurance limits. Victims may also pursue compensation from the driver’s personal assets in serious injury accidents if insurance is insufficient.

Liability When Mechanical Failure Causes Accident

Determining liability is more complicated when a mechanical defect or failure, such as faulty brakes, causes the accident. The rideshare company, driver, mechanic, or manufacturer could potentially be liable in these situations.

Lawsuits against the driver often argue the driver negligently maintained the vehicle and should have discovered and repaired the defect. However, if the driver properly maintained the vehicle, liability against the individual driver is less clear.

Claims against the rideshare company may allege it failed to thoroughly vet the vehicle or driver. But rideshare companies typically argue they are simply technology platforms, not transportation providers, and that vehicle maintenance is solely the driver’s responsibility.

Claims against manufacturers or mechanics allege product liability or repair negligence. Proving these claims can be complex and requires expert analysis of the mechanical failure.

Insurance Coverage for Mechanical Defect Accidents

In mechanical defect accidents, the driver’s rideshare insurance still provides initial coverage. However, victims may need to file claims with multiple policies from the driver, rideshare company, manufacturers, or repair shops to fully recover their losses.

This process can be challenging. However, we can help identify all parties that may share liability and ensure victims receive full and fair compensation.

Damages in Rideshare Accident Lawsuits

Rideshare accident victims may recover various damages, including:

  • Medical expenses, both current and future
  • Lost wages
  • Loss of future earning capacity
  • Pain and suffering
  • Disability or disfigurement
  • Wrongful death damages for fatal accidents

One of our experienced attorneys can valuate and pursue all applicable damages.

Statute of Limitations

Utah’s statute of limitations for personal injury and product liability claims is generally four years from the date of the accident. Victims should file lawsuits within this timeframe or may lose the right to recover compensation. An attorney from Monge & Associates can provide specific advice about the statute of limitations for a particular case.

The Growing Controversy Over Rideshare Safety

In recent years, concerns over rideshare safety have grown. High-profile accidents attributed to mechanical defects have drawn media attention. Victims groups have called for increased regulation of rideshare vehicle maintenance and inspection.

Some cities have responded with stricter rideshare vehicle requirements, like more frequent inspections, vehicle age limits, and maintenance audits. However, many argue these measures don’t go far enough. Rideshare companies resist further regulation, claiming their self-imposed standards sufficiently protect passenger safety. But critics argue rideshare companies lack accountability and transparency regarding their safety protocols.

As the controversy escalates, rideshare safety is likely to receive greater legal and regulatory scrutiny. The outcome could impact liability rules and insurance requirements. Accident victims will be central to this debate, as their real-world experiences reveal critical gaps in current rideshare safety practices. By advocating reforms, victims can help prevent future tragedies, while also pursuing fair compensation through private legal action.

Determining liability in rideshare brake failure and other mechanical defect accidents can be legally and technically complex. Accident victims are encouraged to consult qualified personal injury attorneys to fully understand their options and rights to compensation under Utah law. Prompt legal representation is key to successfully resolving these often devastating rideshare accidents.

Talk to Monge & Associates if you’ve been involved in a rideshare accident. We have offices in 32 locations and 19 states, including Utah, Florida, and Illinois.

Call now for a free consultation on (888) 477-0597